Reformation
Political Correctness is Really Secular Intolerance
The recent Easter season got me thinking about the fight against faith in America.
I recently read an article in my local newspaper (Kitsap SUN) that described the evidence for the Genesis Flood that an engineer had discovered in rock formations in Arizona. It was a great article and even mentioned Noah’s Ark as a possible historical reality.
Two days later, a letter to the editor was posted that made fun of the article–even calling it “laughable” from a scientific standpoint. Why the shrill response?
Well, I think it’s time to give a true meaning to the term “political correctness.” Political correctness is nothing less than secular intolerance. And it’s becoming a menacing bully in many nations.
Here’s the Letter to the Editor, written by Dan Van Eycke, Poulsbo, Washington:
“Regarding Sunday’s article about the supposed proof of Noah’s flood: Could you possibly have found anything less newsworthy to publish? And on page A3 nonetheless!”
“To begin with, young-earth creationism is scientifically irrevelevant and intellectually vacuous–and has been for over a century. And yet the Kitsap SUN thinks its important to print a story about a tourist from Richland, Washington, who claims that a single geologic formation in Arizona is proof of the biblical flood myth, therefore disproving the scientific age of the earth.”
“This man was a tourist with no expertise in geology who thinks he knows better than the countless trained geologists the world over. That he is an engineer from Hanford gives him no more authority on the subject than a warehouse worker from Tacoma. In fact, emphasizing his engineering background is an obvious attempt to impress credulous readers.”
“If articles like this belong in the Kitsap SUN at all–and that’s an extremely big if–they belong on the religion or entertainment pages.”
Note the incredible condescension in the letter. It ends with Mr. Van Eycke relegating the engineer’s fair-minded opinion to the “Religion” section (does he mean the “Myth Section) or the entertainment pages (is that the “Mindless Section?).
C’mon. This is nothing less than bigoted prejudice.
I’ve studied the creation–evolution debate for about forty years. There are fair arguments on both sides. The evidence for an old earth is credible–though certainly not proven. There’s also substantial evidence on the other side that points to a young Earth. Even if the “old earth” theory is true, that doesn’t discount special creation or the main events recorded in the Bible.
Physician-geneticist Francis Collins is one of the most respected scientists in the world. He gave leadership to the Human Genome Project and currently serves as the director of the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland.
Dr. Collins believes in theistic evolution–yet doesn’t discount any of the biblical events. He is a committed Christian whose book, The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief, states clearly how science and the Bible are not necessarily in conflict.
Another book I recently read was entitled the “The Draining Floodwaters: Geologic Evidence reflects the Genesis Text.” by John D. Morris Ph.D and James J.S, Johnson, J.D., Th.D. It presented a cogent scientific case for the evidence of a biblical flood. There are enough “Ds” behind those two names to make you pay attention.
Many of you know that I am completing a doctorate degree this year. The thesis produced detailed research of the cultures and religions of the world. An interesting thing stood out: Many of the world’s diverse cultures possess ancient creation and flood stories. It’s uncanny. I don’t know what the mathematical odds of this are, but they must be pretty slim. Here’s one that appears in my new book.
The Story of the Flood. “The Epic of Gilgamesh” remains one of the most famous tales of the Babylonian period, and gives an amazing parallel account of the global flood (Genesis 7, 8). In the story, Gilgamesh meets one of his ancestors, Utnapishtim, who recalls the story of the global deluge. Warning that the gods were going to destroy the earth, Utnapishtim built a large boat and took refuge in it with his wife and two each of all animals. After the flood waters subsided, Utnapishtim recounts what happened:
“All mankind was turned to clay…I opened the window and the light fell upon my face. I bowed, I sat down, I wept, and over my face ran my tears. I looked upon the world—all was sea…I sent forth a dove and let her go. The dove flew to and fro, but there was no resting place and she returned.”
“I sent forth a shallow and let he go. The swallow flew to and fro, but there was no resting place and she returned. I sent forth a raven and let her go. The raven flew away. She saw the abasement of the waters. She drew near; she waded, she croaked, and came not back. Then I sent everything forth to the four quarters of the heaven. I offered a sacrifice. I made a libation upon the mountains peak.”
“As a result of their obedience, Utnapishtim and his wife are rewarded with “the gift of immortality,” which they explain to Gilgamesh can be obtained by eating a plant that grows in the sea. Gilgamesh finds the plant, but before he eats it, a snake steals it away and gains immortality. A humbled Gilgamesh returns to his city of Uruk, (Erech in Genesis 10:10), and is painfully aware that he does not possess immortality. The story ends unresolved.”
I share portions of this narrative to demonstrate the “memory” of real events that ancient peoples passed down in a confusing culture of raucous polytheism. Of course, many of these stories are embellished–like the end of the “Epic of Gilgamesh.”
But did you notice the similarity to Genesis? You find these same “ancient memory stories” in India, China, Africa and even North and South America. What’s the only plausible explanation?
That the global flood was a real event that left a lasting impact on the scattered peoples of the world. When you add the scientific evidence for a global flood, the playing field is more than level with the explanations from the other side.
So I responded to the letter from the bellicose atheist in these words:
Letter to the Editor,
“I had a different reaction than Dan Van Eycke to your article on the world-wide flood and Noah’s Ark. I was encouraged by the SUN’s open mind on scientific theories and historical data. Just this week I read an article by an American Ph.D who shared similar evidence for a global flood. Of course dinosaur prints being found in sediment alongside human prints, seashell fossils found on mountain tops, and the worldwide presence of “oil,” presents quite a case for a global deluge.”
“As one who has traveled the world extensively, I am especially impressed by the common “flood story” that is found in the historical texts of many nations that seems to validate the biblical one. Van Eycke is welcome to his opinion. But his condescension in calling your article “laughable” was extremely rude. That type of political correctness is really secular intolerance—not a good thing in a free and open society.”
Sincerely,
Ron Boehme
One of the truths that I share in the doctoral thesis (and upcoming new book ) is that of the five views of God that exist in the world, two of them are extremely intolerant of other opinions. They are:
- Atheism secularism – espoused by Mr. Van Eycke above, and
- Islam – a religion that often silences contrary opinions.
Does that intolerant spirit tell you something? Any worldview that doesn’t allow other points of view is either extremely insecure or afraid of the freedom that leads to the truth.
The lesson? Choose your worldview wisely.
A Dred Scott Moment in American History
This is an important week in American history–and I want you to feel its significance. I especially want you to pray for nine very important human beings as a result of your understanding.
I’m sure many of you remember the name of “Dred Scott” from the history books–but you may not recall the magnitude, the infamous nature of the name in American history.
The Dred Scott Decision was handed down by the United States Supreme Court on March 6, 1857 by a 7-2 vote stating that people of African descent brought into the United States and held as slaves (or their descendants, whether or not they were slaves) were not protected by the Constitution and were not U.S. citizens.
The decision was tragic–and flat-out wrong. It led to the Civil War and the death of 600,000 precious lives–all because nine US Supreme Court justices didn’t have the clarity to “judge righteously.”
This week we are faced with another Dred Scott moment. The US Supreme Court is hearing three days of arguments over Obamacare. African-American rights aren’t at stake here–but the rights and future of all of our citizens.
We don’t need another Dred Scott. We need nine individuals to do the right thing.
Those individuals, of course, are the current members of the United States Supreme Court. In recent “man in the street” interviews, I’ve notice how few people even know their names, let alone understand the power that they wield. Here the current US Supreme Court justices, in bullet form for emphasis:
- Chief Justice John Roberts, 57. Nominated by George W. Bush and sworn in 2005.
- Antonin Scalia, 76. Nominated by Ronald Reagan and sworn in 1986.
- Anthony Kennedy, 77. Nominated by President Reagan and sworn in 1988.
- Clarence Thomas, 63. Nominated by George H.W. Bush and sworn in 1991.
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 79. Nominated by Bill Clinton and sworn in 1993.
- Stephen Breyer, 73. Nominated by President Clinton and sworn in 1994.
- Samuel Alito, 61. Nominated by George W. Bush and sworn in 2006.
- Sonia Sotomayor, 57. Nominated by Barack Obama and sworn in 2009.
- Elena Kagan, 51. Nominated by President Obama and sworn in 2010.
Memorize those names: Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, and Kagan. Let’s not be part of the uninformed.
These people are far more important than the following list of nine: Snookie, Gaga, Adele, Tiger, Kobe, Brad, Angelina, Bono, and Bieber.
However, what’s ironic (and a major problem in our culture) is that though I gave you just “one word names” in the second list, most of you probably know all of the people–but we don’t know the first or last names of our US Supreme Court justices who just might determine our national fate for years to come.
It’s true that most of the time, Supreme Court justices are fairly inconspicuous. Normally, the states and national Congress pass laws with little controversy so the judges can stay out of the limelight.
Not now. A liberal president–Senate–and House of 2006-2008–gave us a horrendous boondoggle of a bill that contained 2700 pages, created numerous new bureaucracies, would explode the national debt–and most importantly, takes away a number of our God-given liberties.
We need the Supreme Court on this one–and we don’t need them to give us another dreaded Dred Scott decision.
The justices are hearing arguments this week on the future of Obamacare–the massive progressive takeover of healthcare in this nation–representing one-sixth of the economy. At stake in the ruling are a number of complex and nuanced issues, but the heart of the matter is whether the Federal Government, under the Commerce Clause, has the right to force Americans to buy anything– including insurance.
If the justices get this wrong, it probably won’t start a civil war, but it could be the final straw in the coffin of our economic undoing.
A few days ago, we quietly “celebrated” the two-year anniversary of one of the worst laws in American history– The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act popularly known as Obamacare. No one has done a better job of capturing the essence of that ignominious event than John Hayward, one of my favorite columnists at the National Review.
Here is his astute analysis.
(By-the-way, Human Events puts out an excellent Daily Events e-mail of the best blogs or columns that saves a lot of time and reading. You can sign up for Daily Events here.
ObamaCare’s Lonely Birthday
He’s just a bill, sitting here on Capitol Hill
By John Hayward, March 23, 2012
“This week marks the second birthday of ObamaCare, among the greatest legislative disasters in American history. By even the most conservative estimates, its costs are more than double what we were originally promised.”
“It’s going to strip 20 to 50 million Americans of their health insurance, as overwhelmed employers decide the best course of action is dropping coverage altogether, with the resulting fines increasingly viewed as a wise investment to escape ObamaCare’s clutches. The President’s infamous promise that ‘if you like your plan, you can keep it’ has become a bitter joke, of the variety often traded across the Siberian snow.”
“ObamaCare has been causing health care costs to rise, and it will actually reduce our supply of doctors. It has already destroyed thousands of jobs, and it will soon unleash a fresh avalanche of job-killing taxes on job creators. It has destroyed religion and conscience, forcing Catholic institutions to pay for birth control, and even dropping an abortion surcharge upon everyone enrolled in plans that cover elective abortions.”
“Even as it devours American prosperity, liberty, and health, great festering chunks of spoiled legislation have been dropping from ObamaCare’s flanks. The CLASS Act is gone, as are some of ObamaCare’s most instantly repulsive feeding mechanisms, such as the scheme to force American small businesses to submit millions of 1099 tax forms every year. The House just voted to disable the death panels. Enraged Americans have watched Obama’s Health and Human Services Department issue thousands of ObamaCare waivers to politically connected businesses and labor unions.”
“The Supreme Court is on the verge of striking down the very heart of ObamaCare – the individual mandate that gives Congress limitless power to force Americans to purchase politically approved goods from selected private firms – as the Constitutional outrage it so clearly is.”
“Meanwhile, lopsided majorities of Americans favor the complete repeal of ObamaCare, and have consistently done so for years. It might be the best sustained polling ever seen for a policy preference. The latest Rasmussen poll has Americans favoring repeal 57-39 percent. Strong support for repeal reached an eight-month high in the wake of Obama’s war on the Catholic Church.”
“The Heritage Foundation has launched an online petition demanding ObamaCare repeal. If President Obama could somehow be persuaded to repeal the law, it would become, by a huge margin, the most successful job-creation initiative of his presidency.”
“Of course, that won’t happen… but it’s interesting to note that Obama doesn’t seem very eager to talk about his “signature achievement” any more. It’s swirling down the memory hole, along with those nostalgic sepia-toned photo-ops of the President touting Solyndra as one of the greatest successes of his trillion-dollar ‘stimulus’ bill. “
“Give Obama another month, with a few more points shaved off his poll numbers, and he’ll be claiming ObamaCare wasn’t his initiative per se. Actually, he’ll start doing that the moment Mitt Romney secures the Republican nomination. Isn’t it funny that the sole political value of this towering legislative triumph lies in convincing voters that RomneyCare is just as bad?”
“The Republican National Committee does what the Obama Administration refuses to do, and commemorates the second anniversary of this melancholy bill with a video birthday greeting. Raise a glass of your favorite government-approved healthy beverage (soon to become a mandatory purchase, under the next wave of “individual mandates”) and celebrate ‘ObamaCare’s Lonely Birthday.'”
Well said.
Obamacare, from its inception, was an act of tyranny–a liberal dream to control the lives of three hundred million Americans. It doesn’t matter what the motivations were for such a bill–and maybe some were sincere. But the practical truth is that Obamacare will be the back-breaker of the American economy and the coup d’etat of sinking America into a European style social democracy.
If you like the future of Greece, or Italy, or Portugal in their present state–that’s the direction Obamacare takes us. It kills the free spirit of the American experiment in liberty.
There are only two final ways to resist the tyranny of Obamacare.
The first is to pray that the Supreme Court justices will see the light to either strike down the individual mandate in the legislation or the entire legislation. It is likely that Anthony Kennedy will be the deciding vote in a close Court decision. Pray for Justice Kennedy (and all the rest).
If the Court gives us another Dred Scott disaster–and it’s happened before in history–we do not need to pick up arms and go to war, but rather win at the polls in November. This is the final realistic option. We must elect a God-fearing, Constitution-honoring conservative majority in both the the US House of Representatives, the United States Senate, and also a US president committed to abolishing the law.
If Mitt Romney gains the Republican nomination, he is committed to doing so. (So are the other Republican contenders.)
But our first stop this week should be to watch the Supreme Court proceedings, pray for the presenters and the justices, and await their decision–which may come sometime this summer.
This is a Dred Scott moment in our history.
May our leaders choose wisely while we back them up in prayer.
The Real Reason Gas Prices Are Going Higher
Recently Bill O’Reilly and Lou Dobbs ignited a national debate about rising gasoline prices. Dobbs stunned Fox’s “humble correspondent” by stating on the “O’Reilly Factor” that the main reason for expensive gas in the U.S. is excess “supply” being sold to China and India. That made O’Reilly upset and he spent much of the week blaming the “greedy” oil companies for our woes.
Remember this is Fox News–not the mainstream media. Usually liberals blame the oil companies. However, oil prices are an area where Bill O’Reilly leans left–he really believes the oil executives are “hosing the folks.” He’s believed it for years. He may be partly right.
But I don’t think it’s the best answer.
So why are gas prices are so high, and what can we do about it?
First of all, let’s bring the current administration into the equation. When Barack Obama took office in January of 2009, the average price of gas was $1.85 (seems like an eternity ago). Today prices are closer to $3.85 (depending on your region and state taxes)–a 120 percent increase.
In his Saturday, February 25 radio broadcast, the president said there was no easy answer to the problem and blamed Republican complaints as gimmicks: “We know there’s no silver bullet that will bring down gas prices or reduce our dependence on foreign oil overnight,” he said.
The president suggested that the Republicans have only one answer: drill. But earlier in the week he scoffed at that suggestion: “You know that’s not a plan, especially since we’re already drilling. It’s a bumper sticker.” One journalist wryly commented, “Speaking of bumper stickers, remember ‘Yes We Can!’ Mr. President?
Indeed we do.
After filling up the car this weekend–$45 for three-quarters of a tank–I’ve done some research on rising gas prices. Here’s what I’ve found, with a special eye to the bigger picture.
SHORT TERM PROBLEMS
First, let’s look at our immediate predicament. In February 2012, we have record price levels and a threat of four of five dollars a gallon costs hitting us during the summer months.
Why? Here are what most experts say:
1. Gas prices tend to rise every spring in anticipation of increased demand during the summer driving vacation season. As a result, gas prices hit $3.50 a gallon by February 15, two weeks earlier than in 2011.
2. Global demand is raising the price of crude oil— It stands at $109 a barrel. This accounts for 55% of the price of gasoline. Distribution and taxes influence the remaining 45%. Usually, the latter items don’t change much, so that the daily change in gas prices primarily reflects oil price fluctuations. Right now there is growing demand in the developing countries of Asia (India and China) and the former Soviet Union. Their populations are rising out of poverty, and buying cars and heating oil in record amounts.
3. Commodity trading fear – Oil prices are set by commodities traders who buy and sell futures contracts on the commodities exchanges. These are agreements to buy or sell oil at a specific date in the future at a specific price. Commodities traders can create a self-fulfilling prophecy by bidding up oil futures prices. Once this starts, it can create an asset bubble. In April 2011, fears about unrest in Libya and Egypt sent oil prices up to $113 a barrel. In May 2011, as oil prices dropped, gas prices stayed high. Why? Commodities traders were concerned about refinery closures due to the Mississippi River floods. In February 2012, concerns about a potential military action, by either Israel or even the U.S., against Iran caused high oil prices.
4. Lower US consumption – Oil consumption in the United States is down 15% this year (we’re driving less and experiencing a warm winter). Usually this is a good problem that lowers prices, but this year it was so severe that it led to problem number five.
5. Refinery shutdowns and shake-up – This is probably the most unusual and significant short-term reason for higher prices. On February 23, Bloomberg reported that the U.S. had lost 5 percent of its oil refining capacity in the last 3 months. Over the past year, refineries have faced a squeeze. Prices for Brent crude have gone up, but demand for gasoline in the U.S. is at a 15-year low.
That means refineries haven’t been able to pass on the higher prices to their customers. As a result, companies have chosen to shut down some refineries rather than continue to lose money. This month, two large refineries outside Philadelphia shut down: Sunoco’s plant in Marcus Hook, Pa., and a Conoco Phillips plant in nearby Trainer, Pa. Together they accounted for about 20 percent of all gasoline produced in the Northeast.
Bloomberg gives further insight into the refinery problem:
“The U.S. refining industry is being split in two. On one hand are the older refineries, mostly on the East and Gulf Coasts, that are set up to handle only the higher quality Brent “sweet” crude—the stuff that comes from the Middle East and the North Sea. Brent is easier to refine, though it’s gotten considerably more expensive recently. (Certainly another reason for higher gas prices.)”
“Then there are the plants able to refine the heavier, dirtier West Texas Intermediate (WTI)—the stuff that comes from Canadian tar sands, the deep water of the Gulf of Mexico, and the newer outposts in North Dakota, which just passed Ecuador in oil production. These refineries tend to be clustered in the Midwest—places such as Oklahoma, Kansas, and outside Chicago. While the price of Brent crude has closed at over $120 a barrel in recent days, WTI is trading at closer to $106. That simple differential is the reason older refineries that can handle only Brent are hemorrhaging cash and shutting down, while refineries that can handle WTI are flourishing.”
“’The U.S. refining industry is undergoing a huge, regional transformation,’” says Ben Brockwell, a director at Oil Price Information Services. ‘If you look at refinery utilization rates in the Midwest and Great Lakes areas, they’re running at close to 95 percent capacity, and on the East Coast it’s more like 60 percent,’ he says. This is primarily why the cheapest gas prices in the country are found in such states as Colorado, Utah, Montana, and New Mexico, while New York, Connecticut, and Washington, D.C., have some of the highest prices.”
These five seem to be the current culprits. Steve Maley (Tulsa World) writes a good article on ten ways to deal with these problems in the short term. You can read it here.
But there is a much bigger problem we desperately need to solve.
THE BIG PICTURE
First let’s talk about the the destructive power of inflation. In fact, price inflation is such a “normal” and insidious thing that we barely notice it. We’re used to things going up in price. We’ve been told by the powers that be that rising prices are standard fare.
They weren’t normal in America for our first one hundred and fifty years. For a majority of our nation’s history, our currency remained as “sound as a dollar” and prices changed little from decade to decade. Then in 1914 we created the Federal Reserve and on January 5, 1933 we went off the gold standard. For the past eighty years, we have been systematically devaluing our currency.
The greatest decline of the dollar has happened recently. In the past six years, the dollar has decreased in value by 40%. When you hear wind of QE2 (quantitative easing) and other methods that the Federal Reserve uses to manipulate our currency, don’t rush to applaud them.
We are flooding the world with fiat dollars to stave off default and pay for our massive government debt. Remember when a $20 bill seemed like a decent chunk of money? Remember when coins or change were valuable? We hardly keep them or use them anymore.
The inflationary spending of the Fed is practically criminal–and one reason why some Republicans are voting for Ron Paul. He’s one of the few politicians willing to be honest about it.
Think of monetary inflation as a game of Monopoly. When you “empty the bank” to all the players, you have more money to spend on “Park Place” or anything else–so prices go up. Why? Increased cash in everyone’s wallet “bids” up the value of everything–which devalues the currency. In my brief driving career (1969-2012), monetary inflation has increased gas prices from 25 cents to almost four bucks. That’s a 1600% increase.
We live in a scary time for inflation in America. Food price are up 30%, gasoline 120% in three years, and run-away inflation could be in front of us. But there is a primary reason for inflation. It comes down to a nation’s faith and morals.
America used to be a nation of faith–of forward-thinking, God-believing people. Our faith produced morals, i.e. hard work, financial prudence, self-control, and a greater concern for “posterity” than for ourselves.
Then the Baby Boom and subsequent generations came along. We rejected God’s authority and cast off all restraints on morality–including financial prudence and debt. We became a “consumer” society where meeting my needs was more important that saving for our children. We used credit cards and risky mortgages to fund our immoral (non-right) attitude of living beyond our means. And we elected officials who did the same thing on a federal level.
Faith, morality and freedom produce hope. Unbelief, immorality, and bondage to debt create “uncertainty.” The biggest problem contributing to rising gas prices is uncertainty, i.e. unbelief.
The American people need to turn back to God, restore faith, stop their reckless spending and demand that their leaders do the same. Then, we must elect leaders who have the guts to reign in the Fed, stabilize the dollar, shrink the size of government, pay down the debt, get off the backs of business, protect the environment, and drill bay drill!–for the sake of future generations.
Prudent faith and actions can bring real long term hope–including cheaper gas..
